26 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
26 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From janssen at parc.com Mon Mar 9 14:17:43 2015
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
|
|
it be different?
|
|
In-Reply-To: <B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
|
|
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
|
|
<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
|
|
<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
|
|
<6506.1425915329@parc.com>
|
|
<B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <17104.1425935863@parc.com>
|
|
|
|
Hoa V. DINH <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
> I think using human readable text protocol is still a very good idea since it makes it easier to debug just by logging input/output of the protocol.
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's always been the argument. On the other hand, you don't
|
|
read those logs with your bare Mark-I eyeballs. You use a tool, even
|
|
if it's just less+xterm. Writing a WireShark plugin is so streamlined
|
|
these days that I see no real advantage in the text formats anymore.
|
|
|
|
Bill
|
|
|