wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095012.22629.mbox:2,S

45 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From blong at google.com Thu Jul 17 15:00:32 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP and X-GM-MSGID
In-Reply-To: <88532138-054a-4ed8-89aa-ffd72f89a677@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <CAMMeFX5dySxGS4XwxW=zyt_J+qxq++T=_Tt4DGVKAKhztJ8ZMA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABDm0O8yWvawiMFpT+u6YjH9Eb=2MZbsmt6dqCB3+uU-F+2x_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMMeFX6N-qeo4TT3BkTThrwPVwtm0czP6OjGAuTCohSMaB-zNw@mail.gmail.com>
<874AA50791EC4A89B8989C2ABADF0B3E@gmail.com>
<88532138-054a-4ed8-89aa-ffd72f89a677@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <CABa8R6vdbWY3fyMquvx6F3C0ktX1zMPQVuwugZqneoXGrF8b2g@mail.gmail.com>
Every message on delivery to the user's mailbox will have a Delivered-To
and Received header for that delivery, so they won't be de-dupable at that
level without being able to look at specific sub-sets of the message.
De-duplication of attachments can be useful, though then you need to be
able to extract them and correctly rehydrate to get the full message (if
you're providing access to full messages).
Brandon
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no
> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:00:08 AM CEST, Hoa V. Dinh wrote:
>
>> I?m not sure how much you would gain by reduplicating across accounts.
>>
>
> You haven't seen how googleapps users can cc fourteen teams ;)
>
> Arnt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20140717/4705294d/attachment.html>