wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095011.22623.mbox:2,S

31 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From angel at 16bits.net Wed Sep 3 14:01:39 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?= <angel@16bits.net>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less
secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
In-Reply-To: <03710d62-c480-4224-b33a-96f979ebd1a3@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <5400A146.4020602@mozilla.com>
<CABa8R6se2WefF4q-cFzR2qtU_5_jDL-wioPF+jPmOTdpCaJhtw@mail.gmail.com>
<54011E24.4080209@mozilla.com>
<6f3e9961-32e6-4b4b-866f-7ce5526b0bf8@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
<CABa8R6vJUAo231ECkLyDsTmk08UGgS2E7i6SNZ==x6YwFOiPUw@mail.gmail.com>
<1409774552.1122.3.camel@16bits.net>
<03710d62-c480-4224-b33a-96f979ebd1a3@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <1409778099.1122.7.camel@16bits.net>
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> FWIW, there already is a language extension for IMAP. My name is on the
> RFC, even. I think Ned Freed has an implementation, but I haven't exactly
> been swamped by comments from would-be implementers.
>
> I didn't implement it myself. To be frank I only finished the RFC because
> it was the easiest way out. Sometimes "ship and discard" is easier than any
> other alternative.
>
> Arnt
My bad. The proper thing would then be to use rfc 5255, of course.