wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095009.22620.mbox:2,S

44 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From blong at google.com Fri Oct 17 07:27:31 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing
fields
In-Reply-To: <5f24a2bb-1658-4664-8282-3fc76d3f2c8e@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <CAByrE3HvB=XbamJfTeDPPjLkYdhFOOz919GLJ5LN8xUgXBGpqA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABa8R6vvkxLipPcyzgAV7SfVMFVRdHpUjL6E=Z=GVdVwqOEhhg@mail.gmail.com>
<5f24a2bb-1658-4664-8282-3fc76d3f2c8e@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <CABa8R6saUhaJcyt6YiFSStYfNRnXM1zgfyDxZ4wrKgSnv_6Z_w@mail.gmail.com>
We rolled back and we worked with them and we think we have a solution
which we should be testing soon.
We were sending fetch responses for new messages in the folder and we think
this was causing the problems.
Brandon
On Oct 17, 2014 5:52 AM, "Arnt Gulbrandsen" <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:37:30 PM CEST, Brandon Long wrote:
>
>> We're seeing several reports of programs not expected extra FETCH
>> responses, which we rolled out on Monday. We're rolling back soon, since
>> older versions of a very popular client are having issues (though not to
>> our knowledge with this part of things).
>>
>
> Are you just rolling back, or are you also being politely helpful with the
> maintainers of that client?
>
> Arnt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20141017/4f6f612e/attachment.html>