43 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
43 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From nicolson at google.com Mon Jun 30 14:19:54 2014
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFtaWUgTmljb2xzb24gKOWAquW/l+aYjik=?= <nicolson@google.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] UTF8=ACCEPT and modified utf-7 mailbox names
|
|
In-Reply-To: <50b7b4b0-ec42-4447-a0f1-b9241f1d1984@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
References: <CACU8CfQ-ybGqgOhAU+Kug+BEopXLNGEJ7LFb0Jbby4LVa8m+4g@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
<50b7b4b0-ec42-4447-a0f1-b9241f1d1984@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
Message-ID: <CACU8CfSic52Y3+fScveyeHxjWq_MASvCvJYPX=3DjaukpX+8+w@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Good, definitely makes more sense that way. Why enable the extension if
|
|
you're not willing to use UTF-8?.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
wrote:
|
|
|
|
> On Monday, June 30, 2014 10:23:39 PM CEST, Jamie Nicolson (???) wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>> Suppose a server supports RFC 6855 (UTF8=ACCEPT) and the client has
|
|
>> ENABLEd it. Is it still permissible for the client to send modified UTF-7
|
|
>> encoded mailbox names, or is the client then required to use UTF-8 for
|
|
>> mailbox names?
|
|
>>
|
|
>
|
|
> IMO, required to use UTF8...
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> I'm wondering if the server code should bother running mailbox names
|
|
>> through the UTF-7 decoder after UTF-8 mode has been enabled. If the server
|
|
>> is going to decode the mailbox names, then the client must continue to
|
|
>> escape '&' characters as "&-".
|
|
>>
|
|
>
|
|
> ... because that escaping is not in 6855.
|
|
>
|
|
> Arnt
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20140630/fe64c727/attachment.html>
|