wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095008.22620.mbox:2,S

25 lines
1019 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Fri Oct 17 05:50:15 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing
fields
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6vvkxLipPcyzgAV7SfVMFVRdHpUjL6E=Z=GVdVwqOEhhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAByrE3HvB=XbamJfTeDPPjLkYdhFOOz919GLJ5LN8xUgXBGpqA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABa8R6vvkxLipPcyzgAV7SfVMFVRdHpUjL6E=Z=GVdVwqOEhhg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5f24a2bb-1658-4664-8282-3fc76d3f2c8e@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:37:30 PM CEST, Brandon Long wrote:
> We're seeing several reports of programs not expected extra
> FETCH responses, which we rolled out on Monday. We're rolling
> back soon, since older versions of a very popular client are
> having issues (though not to our knowledge with this part of
> things).
Are you just rolling back, or are you also being politely helpful with the
maintainers of that client?
Arnt