65 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
65 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From blong at google.com Wed Oct 8 13:37:30 2014
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing
|
|
fields
|
|
In-Reply-To: <CAByrE3HvB=XbamJfTeDPPjLkYdhFOOz919GLJ5LN8xUgXBGpqA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
References: <CAByrE3HvB=XbamJfTeDPPjLkYdhFOOz919GLJ5LN8xUgXBGpqA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <CABa8R6vvkxLipPcyzgAV7SfVMFVRdHpUjL6E=Z=GVdVwqOEhhg@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
We're seeing several reports of programs not expected extra FETCH
|
|
responses, which we rolled out on Monday. We're rolling back soon, since
|
|
older versions of a very popular client are having issues (though not to
|
|
our knowledge with this part of things).
|
|
|
|
If you do:
|
|
UID FETCH 299 (X-GM-MSGID X-GM-THRID)
|
|
|
|
You can get:
|
|
* 50 FETCH (UID 299 X-GM-MSGID 1231234123134 X-GM-THRID 1234123123413)
|
|
* 50 FETCH (UID 299 FLAGS (\Seen))
|
|
|
|
if the user has just read the message. I believe that's correctly in spec
|
|
and that other IMAP servers would do the same, unless they suppress updates
|
|
on FETCH responses.
|
|
|
|
Brandon
|
|
|
|
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Eben Freeman <eben@inboxapp.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
> Hi folks,
|
|
> Since Monday, we've been encountering issues in which we issue IMAP calls
|
|
> to Gmail such as
|
|
>
|
|
> UID FETCH 299 (X-GM-MSGID X-GM-THRID)
|
|
>
|
|
> and the response sporadically does not actually contain a value for
|
|
> X-GM-MSGID. Upon retrying, we generally get a complete response.
|
|
>
|
|
> Is this behavior expected, and something we should work around? Or is
|
|
> something awry?
|
|
>
|
|
> For completeness, other calls that sometimes give incomplete responses:
|
|
> UID FETCH 296 (BODY.PEEK[] INTERNALDATE FLAGS X-GM-THRID X-GM-MSGID
|
|
> X-GM-LABELS)
|
|
> (response missing BODY[])
|
|
>
|
|
> UID FETCH 288 X-GM-LABELS
|
|
> (response missing X-GM-LABELS)
|
|
>
|
|
> Thanks,
|
|
> Eben
|
|
>
|
|
> PS. Apologies if this list is the wrong venue for this question -- if so,
|
|
> is there a better one?
|
|
>
|
|
> _______________________________________________
|
|
> Imap-protocol mailing list
|
|
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
|
|
>
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20141008/1a581267/attachment.html>
|