36 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
36 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From eben at inboxapp.com Wed Oct 8 12:07:17 2014
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Eben Freeman <eben@inboxapp.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
|
|
Message-ID: <CAByrE3HvB=XbamJfTeDPPjLkYdhFOOz919GLJ5LN8xUgXBGpqA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Hi folks,
|
|
Since Monday, we've been encountering issues in which we issue IMAP calls
|
|
to Gmail such as
|
|
|
|
UID FETCH 299 (X-GM-MSGID X-GM-THRID)
|
|
|
|
and the response sporadically does not actually contain a value for
|
|
X-GM-MSGID. Upon retrying, we generally get a complete response.
|
|
|
|
Is this behavior expected, and something we should work around? Or is
|
|
something awry?
|
|
|
|
For completeness, other calls that sometimes give incomplete responses:
|
|
UID FETCH 296 (BODY.PEEK[] INTERNALDATE FLAGS X-GM-THRID X-GM-MSGID
|
|
X-GM-LABELS)
|
|
(response missing BODY[])
|
|
|
|
UID FETCH 288 X-GM-LABELS
|
|
(response missing X-GM-LABELS)
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
|
|
Eben
|
|
|
|
PS. Apologies if this list is the wrong venue for this question -- if so,
|
|
is there a better one?
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20141008/37aa69d8/attachment.html>
|