31 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
31 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From njhaveri at apple.com Tue Mar 14 08:49:39 2017
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Neil Jhaveri <njhaveri@apple.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:55 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] What is the current consensus on the Recent
|
|
flag?
|
|
In-Reply-To: <CAPacwgx6aqYdp01-CA0k_saiYmLmCFOizs3TNg4R_PJcMt0WpA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
References: <CAPacwgx6aqYdp01-CA0k_saiYmLmCFOizs3TNg4R_PJcMt0WpA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <B0977B48-3C1E-4872-BA3A-E2B92CDA3B6C@apple.com>
|
|
|
|
I agree, and we aren?t using it in iOS/macOS Mail. We?ve thought about it several times, though? but every time, the semantics proved to not be reliable enough.
|
|
|
|
On Mar 10, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Andris Reinman <andris.reinman@gmail.com<mailto:andris.reinman@gmail.com>> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
|
|
|
|
I'm building a new open source IMAP server (https://github.com/wildduck-email/wildduck) and was wondering about the \Recent flag. Is it even needed today? I would like to keep my server as standards compliant as possible but the ephemeral nature of \Recent makes it a bit difficult to sync between sessions in multiple hosts. It would be doable but the complexity needed does not make it seem worth it.
|
|
|
|
Is there even any major client using this flag in a sane way? I don't think I have even ever encountered it outside the RFCs.
|
|
|
|
Best regards,
|
|
Andris Reinman
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Imap-protocol mailing list
|
|
Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu<mailto:Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu>
|
|
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
|
|
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20170314/78f79acd/attachment.html>
|