MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca Mon Mar 9 18:19:50 2015 To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu From: Lyndon Nerenberg Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018 Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different? In-Reply-To: References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com> <7164.1425831184@parc.com> <1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <6506.1425915329@parc.com> <7782A916-12BB-488C-BD57-697FDB5D47E2@orthanc.ca> Message-ID: On Mar 9, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Imants Cekusins wrote: >> Is your measurement data and methodology for this available online anywhere? > > this is a subjective assessment. Email servers are way too busy for > what they deliver. I believe No, it's not. Everything you are claiming can be measured. No belief required. Do you have measurements to back up your claim? I don't discount it out of hand, but if you can't back it up with proof, I won't believe it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 817 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: