MBOX-Line: From dave at cridland.net  Fri Mar  1 05:14:47 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:50 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] CONDSTORE RFC typo
In-Reply-To: <D5C2D620280948758A0A23AA6E73314C@gmail.com>
References: <D5C2D620280948758A0A23AA6E73314C@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzx08_5zLUJLxkW0EZVdXv0FYiTJERdAWT7g8AqtDJsXfQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 28, 2013 5:24 PM, "Ho? V. Dinh" <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com> wrote:
> RFC 1730 and RFC 2060 mentioned "set". It's been changed to sequence-set
in RFC 3501.
> Therefore, I think the same name should be applied in RFC 4551.

I agree - thankfully it's quite minor. You want to submit an errata?

Dave.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130301/2cbfd7dc/attachment.html>