MBOX-Line: From mrc+imap at panda.com  Mon Jun  6 14:38:19 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc+imap@panda.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:46 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Where to start?
In-Reply-To: <4DED435D.9070900@psaux.com>
References: <4DEBB242.2090200@BusCom.net> <4DEBB58D.3090101@logicprobe.org>
	<4DEBBAB3.2030301@BusCom.net> <4DEBBEC1.3080600@BusCom.net>
	<201106051924.p55JOwpG003543@mxout12.cac.washington.edu>
	<4DEBDFF5.9000301@BusCom.net> <4DED435D.9070900@psaux.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1106061437170.809@hsinghsing.panda.com>

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Tim Showalter wrote:
> If you use the UIDVALIDITY+UID as a UIDL scheme, that works pretty well.

That's how I implement UIDL in my POP3 server implementations.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

