MBOX-Line: From brong at fastmail.fm  Fri Dec  6 20:08:55 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:51 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Size wrong
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6vw3ysDTyRd44CX2Y2TN95=BvP0qJAsHPtqec1PE=OUbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANVPb6s8LbY7FxT5HG+ASs08i1_emf62-5ppgufHCtZMh5DRiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABa8R6s1wM9R7VDY4VbrFqyMyV0q3rc-fr-dWHe+vM8xJCwFkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABa8R6vw3ysDTyRd44CX2Y2TN95=BvP0qJAsHPtqec1PE=OUbg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1386389335.20518.56591617.10E10517@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Also, you sort funny. Dot comes after null in my world.

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013, at 02:58 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
> Ah, right, we compute the attributes in alphabetical order, so normally
> we'd do the BODY first and then RFC822.SIZE would be correct.  Since you're
> using the older RFC822 name instead, its coming later.
> 
> Which is to say that yes the size can be off, but we tried to make it be
> correct when you request both, otherwise Thunderbird would truncate larger
> messages that were being fetched in chunks.
> 
> Brandon
> On Dec 5, 2013 2:57 PM, "Brandon Long" <blong@google.com> wrote:
> 
> > Why ask for the size if you're getting the whole data?  j/k
> >
> > Anyways, I'm a bit surprised that it would be wrong in that context, but
> > yes, they can be off in our implementation.  We've been trying to fix all
> > of our data to prevent it, but the fixes are still ongoing.
> >
> > If you want to send me the account off-list, I can take a look to see if
> > its a known issue causing it in this case or not.
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Davide Gullo <jazzo72@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm fetching data from Gmail IMAP server and I get this response:
> >>
> >>   20293 FETCH (X-GM-MSGID 1345230530776790491 UID 33925 RFC822.SIZE
> >> *14787* RFC822 {*14985*}
> >>
> >> Look at the RFC822.SIZE (14787), it is different from the size in
> >> RFC822 {14985}.
> >> Do you see something like that before?
> >> It could be a bug or I miss something from the IMAP protocol?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Davide Gullo
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Imap-protocol mailing list
> >> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> >> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol


-- 
  Bron Gondwana
  brong@fastmail.fm

