MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Sun Mar 15 14:20:26 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] DKIM signatures on this list
In-Reply-To: <55059FCA.8000006@verizon.net>
References: <20150313211600.25485.qmail@ary.lan>
	<alpine.LSU.2.20.1503131631020.2099@linux-0rhy>
	<CAC4RtVA-D1_yvYb8LOsN+ed7J=SyGNp3qEvgTsW=Gxst4xCw1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55050A00.60405@brokersys.com> <55059FCA.8000006@verizon.net>
Message-ID: <4d3ef14f-8f48-498c-8352-2d6f6a9c11a4@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

Joshua Cranmer writes:
> If you're going to complain about people doing the wrong thing 
> and breaking the specification, common sense says that you 
> should understand what the specification actually says you're 
> supposed to be doing.

I am not a DKIM implementer, and speak as a user. False positives and 
negatives debase the value of the signatures. I expletive expletive mind 
that debasement, and I don't see that the spec forbids my opinion.

Arnt


