MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Sat May 10 00:03:01 2008
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:41 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Optimistic incremental THREAD=REFERENCES
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.1.10.0805091508000.2632@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
References: <1210364641.9518.397.camel@hurina>
	<C4+/sgL3fH13VZgTRBl1nA.md5@lochnagar.oryx.com>
	<E146A798-5E98-4ADB-9B6E-C03D99F50A2E@iki.fi>
	<alpine.WNT.1.10.0805091508000.2632@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
Message-ID: <45inIaUU4XPa0JZ16K6iZQ.md5@lochnagar.oryx.com>

Mark Crispin writes:
> I do not approve of the practice of an implementor deciding not to 
> implement a portion of the specification, even if there seem to be 
> good reasons to do so.

FWIW. I do not advertise THREAD=REFERENCES.

Arnt

