MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi  Mon Jan 14 04:48:35 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:50 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Is there some way to detect servers which
	automatically add sent messages to the Sent mailbox?
In-Reply-To: <1358163144.24711.140661177295453.76384B37@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <647C20F7-BB5D-47DD-BC89-3B0D903D2900@apple.com>
	<7B9C4CD5-75ED-46F7-8AE4-C3415918E905@apple.com>
	<83A6F18656334E6CA23106F9DB1C8EC1@gmail.com>
	<E4D13318-11D2-41EF-979F-2840AF2AF9C9@apple.com>
	<1358152426.27730.105.camel@innu>
	<29D96F78-FC57-4AF5-8177-C71638D5DEB4@apple.com>
	<CABa8R6seWwh3emtqPnYYCrh5v7BSOjh+H5gkkLmSj6KnK5rTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<887FDCAF-16E0-4030-A4A3-1BA58554F038@apple.com>
	<1358163144.24711.140661177295453.76384B37@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <1358167715.10326.11.camel@innu>

On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 22:32 +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I have ranted about this at length about the state of this.  I don't
> think BURL is going to be a solution which gains wide adoption, though
> I'd love to see a convincing argument from anyone who's rolled it out
> to anything other than a corporate-style network where the clients,
> servers and intermediate networks are all controlled by a single
> organisation.   

What's wrong with BURL in non-corporate networks, except maybe stupid
firewalls that break the SMTP traffic?

Currently the main problem that I see with BURL is that no open source
SMTP/submission servers support it without patching (but I expect that
to change soon).



