MBOX-Line: From dinh.viet.hoa at free.fr  Thu May 24 10:35:50 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?DINH_Vi=EAt_Ho=E0?= <dinh.viet.hoa@free.fr>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: FLAGS response
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0705241003090.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>
References: <20070524012401.GA30894@penne.toroid.org>
	<20070524033850.GA31634@penne.toroid.org>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705232059170.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1179984406.32181.1730.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705232314230.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1179992121.32181.1744.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705240831400.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<F5D02140-1B67-4225-AB95-4CC59549CA8C@iki.fi>
	<1180025526.32181.1812.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705241003090.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>
Message-ID: <fc2c80ae0705241035s22cb8459qac22769ea2a1d92e@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/24/07, Mark Crispin <mrc@cac.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> I think that this probably belongs with mailbox metadata manipulation.
> Too bad the ANNOTATE extension got so badly sidetracked.

What's the problem with ANNOTATE extension ?

-- 
DINH Vi?t Ho?

