MBOX-Line: From dinh.viet.hoa at free.fr  Sat Oct 27 09:11:23 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?DINH_Vi=EAt_Ho=E0?= <dinh.viet.hoa@free.fr>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] re: GMail
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710241938220.520@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
References: <alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710241938220.520@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
Message-ID: <fc2c80ae0710270911o23f0b366g942b2956ac3fa@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/25/07, Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu> wrote:
> If I had to rate Gmail's IMAP server by the standards of "ready for prime
> time" my rating would be quite damning; it is non-compliant with the IMAP
> specification and has demonstrable bugs in operation.
>
> Rather than do so, I prefer to consider Gmail's IMAP server to be a first
> development test, and NOT something that is presented as being "ready for
> prime time".
>
> I hope that Google feels the same way, and that Google will soon present
> a server that is "ready for prime time".

an other silly bug:

http://www.colino.net/wordpress-1.5/archives/2007/10/25/dear-gmail/

-- 
DINH Vi?t Ho?

