MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Fri Jun 11 00:56:47 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:43 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
In-Reply-To: <4C11EBE9.5070004@psaux.com>
References: <201006110854.37969.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<4C11E96E.7080502@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <4C11EBE9.5070004@psaux.com>
Message-ID: <4C11EC3F.7030101@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

On 06/11/2010 09:55 AM, Tim Showalter wrote:
> Looks like it's there --
>
>> Additionally, MOVE command can be directly preceeded by UID command,
>> the sequence set argument is then treated as unique identifiers
>> sequence instead of message sequence numbers as defined in [IMAP4]
>> paragraph 6.4.8.

Oh, I didn't notice that. The grammar's wrong then.

> I'm interested in seeing this move forward. It would help both my
> company's server and our clients.

Why? Atomicity or something else?

Arnt

