MBOX-Line: From blong at google.com  Thu May  2 13:37:19 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:51 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Unsure paternity
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBuufkNkmMdxFXo5dW0evAc8sq5Uxo=_DfeJK1Gj5e-2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5180559B.4010000@gmail.com>
	<1367371210.5033.140661224967997.4E7EBBE1@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CABa8R6ueUB9hMMcAWGpuz9RoWyOC-LX=GX8Ls8++iUhxPUHD-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1367451626.16110.140661225409245.52FEA78F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CABa8R6vZuhwEkDn-conxb1Jdg3V2sMG9wVqjasu-9E-z5WNx+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC4RtVBuufkNkmMdxFXo5dW0evAc8sq5Uxo=_DfeJK1Gj5e-2w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABa8R6t-tF6+7S82_Mumsq3=7-Tq36wY7PAX5gpFxMfKmK3tNw@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, unsolicited.  The internal page says unrequested, but apparently it
got mangled in translation.


Brandon


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> On Thursday, May 2, 2013, Brandon Long wrote:
>
>> So, we have some stuff on our support pages, and more in the product
>> forums.
>>
>> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/78761?hl=en&ref_topic=1668982
>>
>> This page lists things we don't support or known bugs we have no plans to
>> fix.
>>
>
>  Thanks for that, Brandon; it's useful.
>
> That page lists this item:
>
>    - untagged FETCH responses.
>
> I presume it means *unsolicited* FETCH responses (not untagged ones), yes?
>
> Barry
>
>    -
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130502/56dd8f13/attachment.html>
