MBOX-Line: From tjs at psaux.com  Wed Mar 11 01:39:32 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Tim Showalter <tjs@psaux.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
 it be different?
In-Reply-To: <86FE3C0E-8F89-4721-B43F-C3126C7C211F@orthanc.ca>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com>
	<86FE3C0E-8F89-4721-B43F-C3126C7C211F@orthanc.ca>
Message-ID: <54FFFF44.6010108@psaux.com>

On 3/10/15 7:23 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:

> And I agree completely, although I did try to convince him that 9600 bps was perhaps a reasonable compromise.

And I would bet you were unsuccessful in this, much to Mark's glee.

Mark had some unusual opinions, but he had pretty good reasons for them. 
  Well, except using NIL in C programs, that's just weird.

We are all worse off for the loss of him.

Tim


