MBOX-Line: From norman at apache.org  Wed Jun 23 09:30:49 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Norman Maurer <norman@apache.org>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Handle failures during STORE command execution
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1006230921240.266@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <AANLkTimu9HE_yXxlM9Zy6yNhvmgoOW3Xlj3aDQmCBDDL@mail.gmail.com>
	<30462.1277309118.168996@puncture>
	<AANLkTimuPuKtomDd6kyvXLkofyQyShbDxRDUZLaeWwQ6@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1006230921240.266@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinV5-f3WXyoR8i-ZGBGDCIXRTYguhqUXMMgP9i1@mail.gmail.com>

Yeah Atomic makes sense, i just searched for a solution where I need
to break down the operation in many pieces. For example when using JCR
as storage we are some kind of limited how much "Updates" we can
handle per transaction, so I was looking for a solution here...

Bye
Norman

2010/6/23, Mark Crispin <mrc+imap@panda.com>:
> PS: in many servers, STORE is atomic for the entire request.
>
> -- Mark --
>
> http://panda.com/mrc
> Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
> Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
>

