MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU  Fri Nov 16 10:51:17 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] FETCH/STORE on out-of-range sequence number
In-Reply-To: <554384819.204731195236079452.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
References: <554384819.204731195236079452.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.99999.0711161049580.7038@pangtzu.panda.com>

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Dan Karp wrote:
>> Note as well that RFC 2180 is Informational.  The fact that an
>> Informational RFC says something does not make it normative.
> It may not mark it as normative, but it unquestionably marks it as acceptable.

Anyone can publish an Informative RFC.  That doesn't mean that what it 
says was valid then, or is balid today.

I never considered 4.1.2 of RFC 2180 to be acceptable.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

