MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU  Sat Dec  1 13:29:50 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:41 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] EXPUNGE on a multi-accessed mailbox with unknown
	\Deleted messages
In-Reply-To: <633892787.3851196540913222.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
References: <633892787.3851196540913222.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.99999.0712011329220.12936@pangtzu.panda.com>

On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Dan Karp wrote:
> Should the new message be silently expunged (with no untagged EXPUNGE) or
> should it be skipped by the EXPUNGE?

That is up to the implementation.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

