MBOX-Line: From imap-protocol at lists.grepular.com  Mon Aug 30 15:16:17 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mike Cardwell <imap-protocol@lists.grepular.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] "Multiple Commands in Progress" real life support
	and ambiguity questions
In-Reply-To: <2721.1283156569.612563@puncture>
References: <4C7A2AB6.6070405@lists.grepular.com>
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1008291038500.370@hsinghsing.panda.com>
	<2721.1283156569.612563@puncture>
Message-ID: <4C7C2DB1.6020107@lists.grepular.com>

On 30/08/2010 09:22, Dave Cridland wrote:

> FWIW, my client can cope with out-of-order execution. My ACAP server
> does ACAP commands out of order (where the protocol support is simpler).

I'd never heared of ACAP until you mentioned it in this email; even
though I've been running a CommuniGate Pro server for 4 years which
supports it... JOOI, what client implementations are there for ACAP?
Wondering if it's worth adding to my desirable feature list...

-- 
Mike Cardwell - Perl/Java/Web developer, Linux admin, Email admin
Read my tech Blog -              https://secure.grepular.com/
Follow me on Twitter -           http://twitter.com/mickeyc
Hire me - http://cardwellit.com/ http://uk.linkedin.com/in/mikecardwell

