MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU  Wed May 23 23:13:54 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: FLAGS response
In-Reply-To: <20070524052407.GA32366@penne.toroid.org>
References: <20070524012401.GA30894@penne.toroid.org>
	<alpine.WNT.0.99.0705231829570.3716@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
	<20070524033850.GA31634@penne.toroid.org>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705232059170.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<20070524052407.GA32366@penne.toroid.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0705232313260.10455@pangtzu.panda.com>

On Thu, 24 May 2007, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2007-05-23 21:22:16 -0700, mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU wrote:
>> Before issuing that FETCH response, the server has to send a FLAGS
>> response with the new keyword.
> Er, I'm sorry, but isn't that what you said would confuse clients in
> response to my earlier message? Or am I missing something important?

You asked about a FLAGS response that listed only the new flag.

The FLAGS response must list all the flags.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

