MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi  Mon Mar 12 17:58:32 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] QA / regression testing / stress testing IMAP
	pseudo-clients?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.0.83.0703121752170.7904@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
References: <"07Mar11. 134508pst. 57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<5aK4EfZGxwhHX3617xc/FQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
	<alpine.OSX.0.83.0703111531070.20984@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1173746936.9167.104.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.WNT.0.83.0703121752170.7904@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Message-ID: <1173747512.9167.112.camel@hurina>

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 17:53 -0700, Mark Crispin wrote:
> 
> > 3. Verify that the server doesn't do anything invalid when stress
> > testing with randomly (but correctly) behaving clients.
> 
> 4. Do "fuzzing" with the server.  Send it arbitrary bogus stuff, and
> see 
> if you can make it crash.  What happens if a tag is 10Kchars?  etc.
> etc. 

Well, yes, but that doesn't anymore tell anything about the server's
IMAP protocol correctness. :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20070313/a38eb8f8/attachment.sig>
