MBOX-Line: From ams at oryx.com  Wed Jan  9 20:35:56 2008
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@oryx.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:41 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: Question on FETCH example in RFC3501
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0801092110230.31840@vanye.mho.net>
References: <b6f3249e0801091938m12cbccd6j4fff9f406cf0fee1@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.WNT.1.00.0801091945320.3080@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
	<b6f3249e0801092004x584dac51t2156511e43b7a7d6@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0801092110230.31840@vanye.mho.net>
Message-ID: <20080110043556.GA25217@toroid.org>

At 2008-01-09 21:23:53 -0700, guenther+imap@sendmail.com wrote:
>
> It's not 100% clear to me what you mean by "mix responses to one
> requests with responses for another".

I think he just meant this:

S: * 1 FETCH (BODY[HEADER.FIELDS] {666}
S: From: foo bar <foo@bar.example.org>
S: * 2 FETCH (UID 1 ...
S: To: bar foo <...

But of course, that can never happen, because each response is
conceptually a single long line, though it may have embedded
literals.

-- ams

