MBOX-Line: From tony at att.com  Tue Apr 11 13:28:35 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:37 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] LIST Clarification
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.65.0604111245200.3332@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
References: <443A7A2D.2070708@consilient.com> <web-35034698@mail.stalker.com>
	<Pine.OSX.4.64.0604101053530.2906@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<web-35035906@mail.stalker.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604101441160.4904@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<443C0286.60200@att.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604111228310.3332@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<443C0704.40301@att.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604111245200.3332@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Message-ID: <443C1173.5030007@att.com>

It can easily be put in as a SHOULD.

	Tony

Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Tony Hansen wrote:
>> When 3501bis gets written, it'd be worth adding a note about this case.
> 
> I'm not convinced that we can, unless we can guarantee that there is no
> implementation out there that does the nonsensical thing.


