MBOX-Line: From David.Harris at pmail.gen.nz  Sun Oct 30 19:45:15 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: David Harris <David.Harris@pmail.gen.nz>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:46 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] BODY.PEEK[section]<origin.size> FETCH response
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1110301823210.9034@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <8F0DA5FA-FB07-4AFA-9C58-8F0927998343@ghoti.org>,
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1110301823210.9034@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <4EAE0BBB.19406.5D99DC56@David.Harris.pmail.gen.nz>

On 30 Oct 2011 at 18:33, Mark Crispin wrote:

> See what happens in one or more the three open-source IMAP servers
> of recognized quality: UW IMAP (or Panda IMAP if you have access to
> it), Cyrus, and Dovecot. These servers almost always agree with
> each other on matters of IMAP protocol (and if they disagree their
> developers will want to know; they go to great efforts on this). 

Just FWIW... Although my Mercury is a very minor player in this 
market, I am also *very* keen to hear of any situations where I am not 
compliant. My IMAP code has been around for a long time, but has 
tended to be hampered by being tied to an ancient and restrictive 
message store, a problem I have just about resolved with a new, 
industrial-strength back end.

With that in place, I am keen to improve my general compliance: I 
know for sure there are one or two places where I'm not (in particular 
in some of the more exotic areas of SEARCH), but will actively take 
on board any politely-worded criticism or feedback.

Cheers!

-- David --

------------------ David Harris -+- Pegasus Mail ----------------------
Box 5451, Dunedin, New Zealand | e-mail: 
David.Harris@pmail.gen.nz
           Phone: +64 3 453-6880 | Fax: +64 3 453-6612

On the menu of a Belgian cafe:
   "Cream dognuts."




