MBOX-Line: From dave at cridland.net  Fri Feb  8 13:16:26 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:50 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Clarification on RFC 6851
In-Reply-To: <85789225-4185-487E-B971-4783437732EB@iki.fi>
References: <51129513.5080905@aol.com> <1360342514.3230.53.camel@hurina>
	<1360356362.25348.140661188777389.5DDC322F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<85789225-4185-487E-B971-4783437732EB@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzyscD572nJXsZOypjLToGP1n6sMLif+68at58rQe4xbfA@mail.gmail.com>

My take:

Say NO if no messages were moved. (For whatever reason).

Say OK if some were. (Typically all extant messages in the range).

Rationale: You need to put in response codes in various places; it's not
clear to me you can put a HIGHESTMODSEQ in a NO response.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130208/535d10c3/attachment.html>
