MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Tue Jun 15 11:52:10 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:44 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] MOVE is a pipeline
In-Reply-To: <484642146.4458.1276626832297.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
References: <1372616189.4386.1276624386644.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
	<1276626345.2916.50.camel@kurkku.sapo.corppt.com>
	<484642146.4458.1276626832297.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
Message-ID: <4C17CBDA.6070604@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

On 06/15/2010 08:33 PM, Dan Karp wrote:
> I think we can stop there.  UID MOVE, like UID FETCH et al, would have
> no problems with EXPUNGE or VANISHED notifications.  It's MOVE (and
> STORE, etc.) that have the issue addressed in RFC 3501 section 7.4.1.

I'd be happy if the document specified only UID MOVE, not MOVE. How 
about the other (would-be) implementers?

Arnt

