MBOX-Line: From dave at cridland.net  Wed Mar 27 11:47:17 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:50 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Working around the evils of LITERAL+
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6vv_fupAVX6bv018L9j-uW=YdW5wJ+oACrd3W_WVJq9Ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABa8R6s3rK5JkXBtV7RWbav9T2GBCg+pw-aWd9=5Szv3ocDS_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<5152E3E6.40506@aj.jp.nec.com> <1364388724.13923.97.camel@innu>
	<CABa8R6vv_fupAVX6bv018L9j-uW=YdW5wJ+oACrd3W_WVJq9Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzyfA2ZnDn3hXQt=DCj5O4y_fRSaW6ocDLMd1VpDWEn6zQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 27 Mar 2013 18:36, "Brandon Long" <blong@google.com> wrote:
>
> We actually had that failure mode to begin with due to a bug, and then
we'd drop the connection after too many bad commands... but of course,
they'd just retry.

I'm hesitant to suggest it, but is it worth sending BYE and dropping the
connection? It's sailing just within the lines of the specification, I
think.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130327/1c900d02/attachment.html>
