MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Wed Dec 20 11:59:19 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Command cancellation
In-Reply-To: <1166644158.22214.365.camel@hurina>
References: <1166644158.22214.365.camel@hurina>
Message-ID: <0kbiJ9w45mLNxYjlJRoZdQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>

Timo Sirainen writes:
> X-CANCEL <tag>
> ...
> Comments?

None now - I'm really in pack-and-leave mode.

> BTW. Has anyone implemented the parallel running of commands before? 
> So that two FETCH commands could send replies mixed together?

Yes.

> I'm just wondering if there are clients that are going to break.

Some mutt breakage was the worst I've seen, and the mutt developers 
fixed it quickly when I reported it. There's breakage in 1.5.x, where x 
is 12 and a little smaller. Generally the clients that send multiple 
commands handle the responses.

STORE+STORE and STATUS+STATUS are common. I posted a longer list a month 
or two ago. Can't remember more now.

Arnt

