MBOX-Line: From MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU  Thu Jun  7 16:11:10 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Concurrent Mailbox Changes.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0706071648360.5267@vanye.mho.net>
References: <46581509.7050201@buni.org> <1180182602.32181.1919.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705260804430.3501@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1181230565.6639.15.camel@mike-laptop>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0706070855180.11475@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0706071648360.5267@vanye.mho.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.0.99.0706071610090.3900@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Note that the final EXISTS response is not required here: the previous EXISTS 
> said eight and there have been exactly two EXPUNGE responses, so the client 
> already knows that exactly six messages remain.

Correct.  I included that EXISTS solely for clarity.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

