MBOX-Line: From stujenerin at aol.com  Thu Jun 17 07:55:55 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: stu <stujenerin@aol.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:44 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] COPY v. QUOTA
In-Reply-To: <4C19CC6A.8000701@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1006161833050.38002@legolas.orthanc.ca>	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1006161910411.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>	<4C19924B.6090705@aol.com>
	<4C19CC6A.8000701@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <4C1A377B.8070300@aol.com>

Pipelining UID FETCH 1:* <anything> with SELECT FOO seems like an unwise 
implementation choice for reasons covered by RFC2683 section 3.2.1.2

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Few (or none?) do it to the extent IMAP allows, but many do it a 
> little. Typical examples include sending several UID STOREs at the 
> same time, or sending UID FETCH 1;* FLAGS without waiting for SELECT 
> FOO to complete.
>


