MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Wed Aug 21 03:58:03 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:51 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Multiple non-waiting UID SEARCH commands
In-Reply-To: <520A622E-1A91-4B04-AD6F-361896D439F5@lasselog.com>
References: <520A622E-1A91-4B04-AD6F-361896D439F5@lasselog.com>
Message-ID: <20130821105802.GD8168@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:26:50AM -0700, Lasse Jansen wrote:
> 1. Is my interpretation correct that the above commands are valid according to the RFC?

Borderline. But I'd say it's okay.

> 2. Do you know of any servers that don't respond in the order of the commands?

No. And I've looked.

The belt-and-braces crowd would suggest implementing ESEARCH: If the
server supports that the untagged response will be tied explicitly to
the appropriated command.

May I ask what you're doing?

Arnt

