MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca  Mon Mar 23 18:42:59 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Is OpenEmailSurvey open to share method or code?
In-Reply-To: <1427153195.246194.244290758.41EF7C3D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <55109D4C.2080900@laposte.net>
	<1427153195.246194.244290758.41EF7C3D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <F90D4251-9EE1-493B-8A5F-31B8A1B41B87@orthanc.ca>

> . OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE ACL RIGHTS=kxten QUOTA MAILBOX-REFERRALS NAMESPACE UIDPLUS NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UNSELECT CHILDREN MULTIAPPEND BINARY CATENATE CONDSTORE ESEARCH SEARCH=FUZZY SORT SORT=MODSEQ SORT=DISPLAY SORT=UID THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES ANNOTATEMORE ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1 METADATA LIST-EXTENDED LIST-STATUS LIST-MYRIGHTS WITHIN QRESYNC SCAN XLIST XMOVE MOVE SPECIAL-USE CREATE-SPECIAL-USE DIGEST=SHA1 LOGINDISABLED XCONVERSATIONS COMPRESS=DEFLATE X-QUOTA=STORAGE X-QUOTA=MESSAGE X-QUOTA=X-ANNOTATION-STORAGE X-QUOTA=X-NUM-FOLDERS IDLE]

The number of extensions to this protocol is completely out of control :-P

I would like to see a survey taken of how many clients actually make use of this cornucopia of enhancements to 3516.  I'm pretty sure some of the older cruft could be deprecated without causing major inconvenience.  I'm game to instrument our servers to start collecting data[1]?  Anyone else interested?

--lyndon

[1] pending management signoff, but I don't think that will be a problem.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 817 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20150323/a1ff5bda/attachment.sig>
