MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Thu Mar 20 12:28:51 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:52 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP SUBMIT Extension, take two
In-Reply-To: <1395341331.29069.96929213.1F949AAB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <5f20eeec-c84b-4395-b89b-dfc243d9c465@flaska.net>
	<66E46BE7-0C45-4EFD-B18F-5A6959AADAC4@gmail.com>
	<db2cac03-876f-4966-bf1f-1a7f8d9f4536@flaska.net>
	<219fd97c-e1fd-48e4-b8ae-fcf96537a9bb@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
	<1395341331.29069.96929213.1F949AAB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <2bd1c873-e62e-42ec-b583-196bb619de04@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 7:48:51 PM CEST, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I agree that two step is probably enough - one for upload, and one for
> "send existing message".

I too like two steps better than either one or three. But I haven't a 
strong argument why two is better than one.

Arnt

