MBOX-Line: From tjs at psaux.com  Tue Apr 11 11:35:58 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Tim Showalter <tjs@psaux.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:37 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: LIST Clarification
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.65.0604110915540.2132@Shimo-Tomobiki.panda.com>
References: <443A7A2D.2070708@consilient.com>
	<web-35034698@mail.stalker.com>	<Pine.OSX.4.64.0604101053530.2906@pangtzu.panda.com>	<web-35035906@mail.stalker.com>	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604101441160.4904@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>	<20060411082634.GB23615@fone>	<V/XtcajgI1zbICUGR4NgMQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>	<20060411112740.GC28799@fone>	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604110832540.3456@Shimo-Tomobiki.panda.com>	<usmePlkdqKrhRpI2MaGmaQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604110915540.2132@Shimo-Tomobiki.panda.com>
Message-ID: <443BF70E.8070207@psaux.com>

Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> Mark Crispin writes:
>>> I presume that you don't want to hear "INBOX should not be dual use".
>>
>> I wonder how MrSam would react if you were to put that into 3501bis?
> 
> I prefer not to find out.  :-)

I think the ship has sailed on this one.  Cyrus has had a dual-use INBOX 
for about ten years.

Tim

