MBOX-Line: From blong at google.com  Fri Jan 24 12:04:26 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:52 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail and IDLE flags changes
In-Reply-To: <20140124123018.Horde.ISM6FP9eZKKDDqTOtSqihQ1@bigworm.curecanti.org>
References: <CABDm0O-OnP08r5-d6EpU9JM34FAaebRQGOUwRNi1nY=+x9BhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5955E352-F7CD-4DBB-A191-F748CCD3932E@gmail.com>
	<52E18829.40305@earthlink.net>
	<CABa8R6u0_=+EesY6=P2RasNaGzGgPmRdOHfE32f8Tw44baSPFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKHUCzwDRjTSNMDOdtmXi5vsPLk=vwgPK4Y4qgrsAVdpWyn0dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABa8R6tdfj+q-dmFaANw7Ka3h5t5fO52+NRF9yUpK-VLKwuDxQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140124123018.Horde.ISM6FP9eZKKDDqTOtSqihQ1@bigworm.curecanti.org>
Message-ID: <CABa8R6spJvN2u2X7GK+Qq5ZigjPunXc=DCYscA5mN71Poq23oA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Michael M Slusarz
<slusarz@curecanti.org>wrote:

> Quoting Brandon Long <blong@google.com>:
>
>  Currently, Gmail never sends unsolicited untagged FETCH responses.  This
>> has been documented in our help center since day one, ie:
>> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/78761?hl=en&ref_topic=3397501
>>
>
> On that page, shouldn't it be "unsolicited FETCH responses" instead of
> "untagged FETCH responses"?  All FETCH responses are untagged, after all.


Yes, I feel like I've pinged them to change that a number of times, I shall
try again.

Brandon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20140124/178153ba/attachment.html>
