MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Fri Jun 15 05:25:54 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] FLAGS & PERMANENTFLAGS in IMAP4rev1
In-Reply-To: <20070614135814.E17807@orthanc.ca>
References: <466FE56C.7000900@hiramoto.org>
	<fc2c80ae0706132348w7cddbe34jbc589498a78b3cff@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070614003209.E9774@orthanc.ca>
	<fc2c80ae0706140126r7a8d511csa3c17aa2e2eaec15@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070614135814.E17807@orthanc.ca>
Message-ID: <qOlqB02CECcxebaPnPnjRw.md5@libertango.oryx.com>

Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
>> I do not see anything wrong in using flags for marking messages as Junk.
>
> There isn't, as long as all the clients agree on the same set of flags.

Hm... what happened to the imap-keywords draft?

Arnt

