MBOX-Line: From witold.krecicki at firma.o2.pl  Fri Jun 11 05:42:28 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Witold =?utf-8?q?Kr=C4=99cicki?= <witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:43 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
In-Reply-To: <4C12296C.6030903@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <201006110854.37969.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<20131949-0279-4455-8FB9-99E4030A6904@iki.fi>
	<4C12296C.6030903@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <201006111442.28346.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>

On Friday 11 of June 2010 14:17:48 Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 02:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > People (webmail developers mainly) still once in a while ask me to
> > implement MOVE, but I think it's mainly about convenience to them.
> 
> So they don't have to test the result of COPY. Makes sense.
Well, the usual way of dealing with things in a 'computer' world is that if 
you have to do the same sequence of things over and over again (copy + store + 
expunge in that case - which IMAP clients do often, no matter what the 'IMAP 
philosophy' states) it is better to automatize it and do 'copystoreandexpunge' 
which is simply 'move', and I'm not suprised that IMAP clients authors would 
appreciate this extension.

-- 
Witold Kr?cicki

Grupa o2 Sp??ka z o.o., ul. Jutrzenki 177, 02-231 Warszawa,
KRS 0000140518, S?d Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy, 
Kapita? zak?adowy 377.298,00 z?., NIP 521-31-11-513

