MBOX-Line: From MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU  Tue Apr 11 08:33:43 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:37 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: LIST Clarification
In-Reply-To: <20060411112740.GC28799@fone>
References: <443A7A2D.2070708@consilient.com> <web-35034698@mail.stalker.com>
	<Pine.OSX.4.64.0604101053530.2906@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<web-35035906@mail.stalker.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0604101441160.4904@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<20060411082634.GB23615@fone>
	<V/XtcajgI1zbICUGR4NgMQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
	<20060411112740.GC28799@fone>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.65.0604110832540.3456@Shimo-Tomobiki.panda.com>

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Ingo Schurr wrote:
> Let's see what Mr. IMAP protocol has to say about this... ;)

I presume that you don't want to hear "INBOX should not be dual use".

;-)

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

