MBOX-Line: From dinh.viet.hoa at free.fr  Thu Jun 14 01:26:25 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?DINH_Vi=EAt_Ho=E0?= <dinh.viet.hoa@free.fr>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] FLAGS & PERMANENTFLAGS in IMAP4rev1
In-Reply-To: <20070614003209.E9774@orthanc.ca>
References: <466FE56C.7000900@hiramoto.org>
	<fc2c80ae0706132348w7cddbe34jbc589498a78b3cff@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070614003209.E9774@orthanc.ca>
Message-ID: <fc2c80ae0706140126r7a8d511csa3c17aa2e2eaec15@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/14/07, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> > FYI, that's what Apple Mail.app already does.
>
> Mail.app gets a few things wrong.  But now that their developers are
> participating with the IMAP community we are getting those bugs fixed.

Do you have any example(s) of this ?
I do not see anything wrong in using flags for marking messages as Junk.

-- 
DINH Vi?t Ho?

