MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Sat Apr  1 00:52:32 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:37 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Thread extension
In-Reply-To: <1143847047.3985.42.camel@hurina>
References: <1143819932.8744.163.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.OSX.4.64.0603310950110.26204@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1143843283.3985.18.camel@hurina>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0603311421060.4704@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<1143847047.3985.42.camel@hurina>
Message-ID: <JmYWt2G05c6KmgHRXc0OKQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>

Timo Sirainen writes:
> With my 787 message INBOX it found one non-insertion and with a 2000 
> mail mailing list it found 3 non-insertions.

Let me guess: Mailing list threads where some thread participants are 
cc'd, and mail servers delivering several messages in a thread 
practically at the same time when a network connection comes up after 
downtime.

Arnt

