MBOX-Line: From imap-protocol at lists.grepular.com  Sun Aug 29 12:04:01 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mike Cardwell <imap-protocol@lists.grepular.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] "Multiple Commands in Progress" real life support
	and ambiguity questions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1008291038500.370@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <4C7A2AB6.6070405@lists.grepular.com>
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1008291038500.370@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <4C7AAF21.5040702@lists.grepular.com>

On 29/08/2010 19:31, Mark Crispin wrote:

> Bottom line:
> 
> As a server implementor, you can disregard section 5.5 entirely, with the
> exception that you MUST NOT clear the command input buffer after reading a
> command (because there may be a pipelined command following the current
> command).  Section 5.5 should be considered to be solely implementation
> advice for clients that wish to pipeline.

Excellent. You just gave me the exact answer I was hoping for. Thanks.

-- 
Mike Cardwell - Perl/Java/Web developer, Linux admin, Email admin
Read my tech Blog -              https://secure.grepular.com/
Follow me on Twitter -           http://twitter.com/mickeyc
Hire me - http://cardwellit.com/ http://uk.linkedin.com/in/mikecardwell

