MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Wed Dec 20 12:07:57 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Command cancellation
In-Reply-To: <0kbiJ9w45mLNxYjlJRoZdQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
References: <1166644158.22214.365.camel@hurina>
	<0kbiJ9w45mLNxYjlJRoZdQ.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
Message-ID: <GlQxLkwC3yhP94/zDRGAIg.md5@libertango.oryx.com>

Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
>> BTW. Has anyone implemented the parallel running of commands before? 
>> So that two FETCH commands could send replies mixed together?
>
> Yes.

Some Christmas fun for you:

a select mailbox1
b fetch * uid
c select mailbox2
d fetch * uid

I didn't care much about that sequence - it's both invalid and AFAICT unused.

a seach body a
b logout
c noop

You must execute those in order: Either a, b or a, b, c (NOOP is in 
command-any, and command-any is valid after LOGOUT). I like this one ;)

Arnt

