MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU  Fri Jun  1 16:45:43 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Subscriptions in IMAP
In-Reply-To: <8D664A9D-1676-4E53-87AB-4BBFB64D834A@iki.fi>
References: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0705301048240.11683@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<20070530113546.Q27473@orthanc.ca>
	<alpine.WNT.0.99.0705301146290.5388@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
	<BF01B191-D34E-47DE-A4FB-EAF1CADE4715@apple.com>
	<1180563766.32181.2028.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.WNT.0.99.0705301555120.2080@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
	<8046.1180599490.471444@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705311326310.13729@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<3770.1180685763.825922@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0706011310460.27093@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<8D664A9D-1676-4E53-87AB-4BBFB64D834A@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0706011644000.27093@pangtzu.panda.com>

On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Are you planning on updating IMAP4rev1 anytime soon? I joined this list just 
> before RFC 3501 was released, so I don't know how the previous revisions have 
> started. This and some other things could probably be written a bit 
> differently to be more easily understandable. Some things could probably be 
> even removed, such as APPEND talking about requiring to preserve 8bit data.

Yes, there will undoubtably be yet another IMAP base specification 
Proposed Standard.

This is not a light undertaking.  Each revision of the base specification 
takes at least a year of work.


-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

