MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Tue Mar 10 04:40:33 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
 it be different?
In-Reply-To: <6506.1425915329@parc.com>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
	<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
	<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<6506.1425915329@parc.com>
Message-ID: <93ca8a07-02d5-47cc-8b6e-aa7cb2f02145@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

Bill Janssen writes:
> Sure, JMAP's great, but it's very email-specific.

I put that differently: It leverages JSON well and does a great job of 
avoiding second-system syndrome.

What you suggest doing risks following Postgres multimaster replication 
down a long, winding, tiresome path.

Arnt


