MBOX-Line: From witold.krecicki at firma.o2.pl  Mon Jun 14 13:08:55 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Witold =?utf-8?q?Kr=C4=99cicki?= <witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:44 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: IMAP MOVE extension
In-Reply-To: <20100614200128.GF4182@dan.olp.net>
References: <201006110854.37969.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<201006142156.52776.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<20100614200128.GF4182@dan.olp.net>
Message-ID: <201006142208.55823.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>

On Monday 14 of June 2010 22:01:28 Dan White wrote:
> On 14/06/10 21:56 +0200, Witold Kr?cicki wrote:
> >On Monday 14 of June 2010 21:54:24 Dan White wrote:
> >> On 14/06/10 21:50 +0200, Witold Kr?cicki wrote:
> >> >On Monday 14 of June 2010 21:46:00 Dan White wrote:
> >> >> "Move to <folder drop down list>" is a common function of our webmail
> >> >> client and of many email clients. None of them (that I have used)
> >> >> depend on an IMAP move command.
> >> >
> >> >Maybe because there's no IMAP move command?
> >> 
> >> Yes.
> >
> >.... I'm waiting for the point
> 
> I understand there are several reasons for your proposal, and I don't mean
> to belittle it.
> 
> My point was in response to your statement that users want to have a move
> function within their emails clients. My intent was to point out that many
> email clients already implement a move function without having to resort to
> an IMAP MOVE command, hence that is not a valid reason to propose one.
That can fail in case of quota and moving large amount of messages. In this 
case user sees that it's not move, it's a mere emulation by means of copy + 
delete. 
-- 
Witold Kr?cicki

Grupa o2 Sp??ka z o.o., ul. Jutrzenki 177, 02-231 Warszawa,
KRS 0000140518, S?d Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy, 
Kapita? zak?adowy 377.298,00 z?., NIP 521-31-11-513

