MBOX-Line: From slusarz at curecanti.org  Wed Mar 25 12:21:19 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Michael M Slusarz <slusarz@curecanti.org>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail flags issue, timing-sensitive
In-Reply-To: <CAN7dqjBcK_UZ1uYcT-G=a7N7W=g_JoAXf=kHSL6sz9EmMtc-9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN7dqjCYRb2sbOZS49hiqgrSsfKFTzyT-b5fKHm0U4mBGvDRzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABa8R6t01i4CMumftDbTdY_xC7WYWLCmh7__Qg+zrsw8dZxHwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN7dqjAxtu=k65vF-gshYYiEdMVeJ_j_ZruB2RLQRHTxouRckA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN7dqjBcK_UZ1uYcT-G=a7N7W=g_JoAXf=kHSL6sz9EmMtc-9g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150325132119.Horde.H9br3-icKPf32c5xmMNhdfM@bigworm.curecanti.org>

Quoting Kostya Vasilyev <kmansoft@gmail.com>:

> New state reported without \Answered first (wrong), then with it (right),
> and the MODSEQ is the same (which is also wrong).
>
> 21:54:31.077 [IMAP.5800] Sending: kman25 UID STORE 196290 +FLAGS (\Flagged)
> 21:54:31.672  [IMAP_RAW.5800] Data is <167>:
> 21:54:31.672  * 20927 FETCH (FLAGS (\Flagged \Seen) MODSEQ (20736711) UID
> 196290)
> 21:54:31.672 * 20927 FETCH (UID 196290 MODSEQ (20736711) FLAGS (\Answered
> \Flagged \Seen))
> 21:54:31.672  kman25 OK Success

This is inefficient.  But it is perfectly acceptable IMAP.

michael


