MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Mon Jan 18 09:17:16 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:43 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS?
In-Reply-To: <01NILLMPPQHY004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <9A584868-5961-4871-B32E-915394043727@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>
	<01NIK8RBBRJK004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
	<alpine.LSU.2.00.1001181311440.6203@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
	<01NILLMPPQHY004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
Message-ID: <eNXu4gTOhjZf9cCBdjCJLA.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no>

Ned Freed writes:
> Is smtps as widely deployed as pops or imaps? If it is then yes, it 
> should be in there. But if it isn't - and my experience has been that 
> it isn't - then there's no need.

Outlook likes to use smtps. To me that's wide enough deployment. (Or was 
it OE? Doesn't matter, both are widely used.)

Arnt

