MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Wed Sep  7 09:57:44 2005
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:36 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SELECT of same mailbox
In-Reply-To: <5b93232d05090709125cea8c08@mail.google.com>
References: <UsPqTMxta5Q38J/4ek2JBA.md5@bluegrass.trish.de>
	<5b93232d050907075812659c02@mail.google.com>
	<Pine.OSX.4.63.0509070829570.28350@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<5b93232d05090709125cea8c08@mail.google.com>
Message-ID: <Hi7VDYhD2/n8VBph7IbU2A.md5@bluegrass.trish.de>

Rob Siemborski writes:
> Offhand I prefer the second, since it clarifies exactly what is 
> expected, as opposed to leaving it up for interpretation.

Agreed.

> PS (is anyone else getting lots of bounces from amazon and 
> internet-drafts@ietf.org in this thread?)

I wouldn't notice amazon. But I get a notice thanking me for submitting 
an internet-draft every time I post to this list.

Arnt

