MBOX-Line: From yiorgos.adamopoulos at gmail.com  Sat Mar  7 05:26:48 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos <yiorgos.adamopoulos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
 it be different?
In-Reply-To: <CAGGVAjyvMneEjv_WsHCuTuc_sMwX6V75hyZu89d7+7SexSvFNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com>
	<edb885ee-c48b-4c55-bba4-ad29923fbb7a@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
	<CAGGVAjyvMneEjv_WsHCuTuc_sMwX6V75hyZu89d7+7SexSvFNw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGGVAjx21POQfgwXbLFjkRj6Rmn2SPEvPks6At425yt=bEeQZQ@mail.gmail.com>

(When replying with a headache you write things upside down)

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Yiorgos Adamopoulos
<yiorgos.adamopoulos@gmail.com> wrote:
> The OP also asked whether it would have been more stateless. Well,
> given the criticism that Mark exercised on how students do not learn
> how to maintain state in their programs, it seems to me that he would
> have gone stateless. He would have been Mark if he did.

CORRECTION: I believe that Mark would still write it the way he did
with regards to state (i.e. not stateless). He wouldn't have been Mark
if he did not.

-- 
"If technology is your thing plan to die reading manuals" --Gene Woolsey

