MBOX-Line: From benny at diku.dk  Wed May 18 01:33:11 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Benny =?utf-8?q?Kj=C3=A6r?= Nielsen <benny@diku.dk>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Thoughts on keyword improvements/enhancements
In-Reply-To: <20110518100807.29d4b72c@arbre.eng.oslo.osa>
References: <20110518011645.Horde.6sTkboF5lbhN03Jd3XNndCA@bigworm.curecanti.org>
	<20110518100807.29d4b72c@arbre.eng.oslo.osa>
Message-ID: <36617A6D-5182-4F9D-A2D3-5DD3D11F45FD@diku.dk>

On 18 May 2011, at 10:08, Bron Gondwana wrote:

> Absolutely.  While you're at it, can you look into standardising
> $NotSpam $NonSpam NotSpam NonSpam Spam Junk NotJunk, etc - all the
> various magic flags used by different clients to label UBE.
>
> This boat may well have sailed...

The boat may have sailed, but these flags have "recently" been 
standardised by Alexey Melnikov:

	http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-keywords/imap-keywords.xml
	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00441.html

For the record, I would (as an email client developer) also welcome 
improvements of IMAP keywords.

Kind regards,

Benny Kj?r Nielsen

