MBOX-Line: From alexey.melnikov at isode.com  Mon Jan 14 04:56:17 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:50 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Is there some way to detect servers which
	automatically add sent messages to the Sent mailbox?
In-Reply-To: <1358167715.10326.11.camel@innu>
References: <647C20F7-BB5D-47DD-BC89-3B0D903D2900@apple.com>
	<7B9C4CD5-75ED-46F7-8AE4-C3415918E905@apple.com>
	<83A6F18656334E6CA23106F9DB1C8EC1@gmail.com>
	<E4D13318-11D2-41EF-979F-2840AF2AF9C9@apple.com>
	<1358152426.27730.105.camel@innu>
	<29D96F78-FC57-4AF5-8177-C71638D5DEB4@apple.com>
	<CABa8R6seWwh3emtqPnYYCrh5v7BSOjh+H5gkkLmSj6KnK5rTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<887FDCAF-16E0-4030-A4A3-1BA58554F038@apple.com>
	<1358163144.24711.140661177295453.76384B37@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<1358167715.10326.11.camel@innu>
Message-ID: <50F40071.3080809@isode.com>

On 14/01/2013 12:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 22:32 +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> I have ranted about this at length about the state of this.  I don't
>> think BURL is going to be a solution which gains wide adoption, though
>> I'd love to see a convincing argument from anyone who's rolled it out
>> to anything other than a corporate-style network where the clients,
>> servers and intermediate networks are all controlled by a single
>> organisation.
> What's wrong with BURL in non-corporate networks, except maybe stupid
> firewalls that break the SMTP traffic?
>
> Currently the main problem that I see with BURL is that no open source
> SMTP/submission servers support it without patching (but I expect that
> to change soon).
Exactly! Many IMAP servers supports URLAUTH. I haven't seen many SMTP 
servers that support BURL. (Isode M-Switch does, yay! Buy Isode software 
;-)).


