MBOX-Line: From dkarp at zimbra.com  Sun Jun  1 13:24:34 2008
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Dan Karp <dkarp@zimbra.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:42 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Proxy IP forwarding
In-Reply-To: <461F5E4A-6B12-4CAB-AFA6-D5CBABF0D7B6@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <882332291.21641212351874331.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>

> That sounds interesting, although it kind of violates a MUST NOT in  
> the ID spec:
> 
> > Implementations MUST NOT make operational changes based on the data 
> > sent as part of the ID command or response. The ID command is for  
> > human consumption only, and is not to be used in improving the  
> > performance of clients or servers.

All we're doing is including the IP in log entries, so I think we're
OK in that regard.  But bending that rule in the case where access is
only through a proxy doesn't seem very bad.

