MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi  Wed Apr 20 11:10:26 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] RFC 5464 METADATA Extension examples vs BNF
	inconsistency
In-Reply-To: <1302591576.8511.1440130785@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1302591576.8511.1440130785@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <45F5143C-BA17-4974-B74D-27C4CAF758CE@iki.fi>

On 12.4.2011, at 9.59, Robert Mueller wrote:

> The BNF says options come first, the 4.2. GETMETADATA command section
> and examples show mailbox coming first.

ABNF should always be trusted over examples. I reported this as errata: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5464


