MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Tue Jul  1 00:38:35 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] UTF8=ACCEPT and modified utf-7 mailbox names
In-Reply-To: <CACU8CfSic52Y3+fScveyeHxjWq_MASvCvJYPX=3DjaukpX+8+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACU8CfQ-ybGqgOhAU+Kug+BEopXLNGEJ7LFb0Jbby4LVa8m+4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<50b7b4b0-ec42-4447-a0f1-b9241f1d1984@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
	<CACU8CfSic52Y3+fScveyeHxjWq_MASvCvJYPX=3DjaukpX+8+w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8a298643-84c7-4b94-ac2c-7b8e778ab7b5@gulbrandsen.priv.no>

On Monday, June 30, 2014 11:19:54 PM CEST, Jamie Nicolson (???) wrote:
> Good, definitely makes more sense that way. Why enable the 
> extension if you're not willing to use UTF-8?.

What I like most about 6532/6855 is that 99% of the odd quoting goes away 
and we get one single form of string encoding. There's a very small bit 
left (localparts conaining backslases, spaces etc), but even it is 
irrelevant in practice due to poor support. Lovely.

Arnt


