MBOX-Line: From tjs at psaux.com  Fri Jun 11 00:55:21 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Tim Showalter <tjs@psaux.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:43 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
In-Reply-To: <4C11E96E.7080502@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <201006110854.37969.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<4C11E96E.7080502@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <4C11EBE9.5070004@psaux.com>

On 6/11/10 12:44 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> I implemented that a while ago, but I chose to implement only UID MOVE
> (an atomic uid-based move being what was needed), and you chose to
> specify only MOVE. Why not UID?

Looks like it's there --

>    Additionally, MOVE command can be directly preceeded by UID command,
>    the sequence set argument is then treated as unique identifiers
>    sequence instead of message sequence numbers as defined in [IMAP4]
>    paragraph 6.4.8.

I'm interested in seeing this move forward.  It would help both my 
company's server and our clients.

Tim


