MBOX-Line: From brong at fastmail.fm  Mon Oct 31 16:03:25 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:47 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] BODY.PEEK[section]<origin.size> FETCH response
In-Reply-To: <3124.1320100892.530453@puncture>
References: <8F0DA5FA-FB07-4AFA-9C58-8F0927998343@ghoti.org><alpine.OSX.2.00.1110301823210.9034@hsinghsing.panda.com><CABa8R6uyrHJ6AqQoGfMcLztG-zovaVK4FEFep8ibpYc2-6b7ig@mail.gmail.com><alpine.OSX.2.00.1110311352000.9034@hsinghsing.panda.com><1320096826.9022.140660992904397@webmail.messagingengine.com><CABa8R6uckusexAOtq-1-PHd58Sk7Xi0GOwLtwn1HMfiAA52C9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<3124.1320100892.530453@puncture>
Message-ID: <1320102205.30039.140660992940805@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Monday, October 31, 2011 10:41 PM, "Dave Cridland" <dave@cridland.net> wrote:
> On Mon Oct 31 22:06:47 2011, Brandon Long wrote:
> > talking existing extensions, not making up new ones).   Ie, we
> > implemented COMPRESS when we saw that Thunderbird supported it (and
> > used their implementation to fix bugs in ours) and then when Apple  
> > saw
> > we supported it, they added it to iOS (I'm guessing, but that's what
> > it looked like).
> 
> So Thunderbird implemented it because Cyrus did.

Basically, yes.  And I think Cyrus implemented it mainly for inter-Cyrus
links to make murder more efficient between campuses - and then I wanted
it for replication as well.

> Cyrus implemented it because Polymer and M-Box did. (Actually I can't  
> recall if M-Box or Cyrus got there first).
> 
> And Polymer did because Arnt did in Archiveopteryx.
> 
> So actually everyone's just slavishly following Arnt.
> 
> So on that principle, if I can get Arnt to implement ACAP, then  
> Google will surely follow.

Go for it!

Bron.
-- 
  Bron Gondwana
  brong@fastmail.fm


