MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Mon Mar 12 02:24:20 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] mailbox hierarchy conventions?
In-Reply-To: <DAA27A54-569E-4175-917A-9C958932B9FF@iki.fi>
References: <"07Mar11. 154843pst. 57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<alpine.OSX.0.83.0703111704450.20984@pangtzu.panda.com> <"07Mar11.
	162448pst. 57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<alpine.OSX.0.83.0703111726370.20984@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1173661726.17598.331.camel@hurina> <"07Mar11. 195659pst.
	57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<DAA27A54-569E-4175-917A-9C958932B9FF@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <LH8fqBnpjUw/p8f6Fm8BYw.md5@libertango.oryx.com>

Timo Sirainen writes:
> Hmm. It probably was enough if the UID was in the "* FETCH" line.

No, someone else reported problems with that a couple of years ago. It 
has to be at (or near?) the start.

I haven't investigated. I'd rather put UID first than Investigate 
Outlook bugs. ?This may or may not be what's going on: life is too 
short to spend debugging Intel parts so I really don't care to 
investigate further.?

Arnt

