MBOX-Line: From MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU  Wed Jan  3 07:38:13 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] reporting/detecting expunged messages
In-Reply-To: <nkinvq2thhZkY7LL5u4HSQ.md5@[192.168.1.104]>
References: <4505F2FE.8090807@sun.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609111648410.5544@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<450713AB.4090601@sun.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609121316280.2164@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<45071A57.5080406@sun.com>
	<9SYO8YZNXU3qj9EYGtuGNg.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609121437140.2164@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<2xKZXsAOqJTXDcZB/xUw7g.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609141841560.1540@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
	<LWKbk3lpdVhtHUTm38BDeA.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
	<A3CFCE55-56CC-4CC1-ACD8-410341B7157C@iki.fi>
	<w1EVhSzZvq4UsaZIKe/RlA.md5@[192.168.1.104]>
	<077244CE-5AA8-4524-9A77-27E14C934F84@iki.fi>
	<nkinvq2thhZkY7LL5u4HSQ.md5@[192.168.1.104]>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.0.81.0701040037150.4044@Shimo-Tomobiki.panda.com>

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
> > What was the problem with 4.1.3 anyway? Cyrus seems to be using it, so 
> > it can't be that bad either.
> I don't think 4.1.3 is terrible.

Only server implementors would say that.

Client implementors would say that 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 are both terrible. 
They cause the server to behave in completely unexpected ways.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

