MBOX-Line: From dshaw at jabberwocky.com  Mon Nov 23 14:45:45 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:55 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] UID MOVE and untagged OKs
In-Reply-To: <1447882210.1528738.443668657.2E2AAB9D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <25069F83-83C9-4130-B0D0-6C4FCC37A292@jabberwocky.com>
	<564BBF09.7050804@teamaol.com>
	<CABa8R6tSWdWpSc2Xxfp+tWVk=GGRHYsdX-YmGXPVoAGCBBdPQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<564BC814.8080409@comaxis.com>
	<1447817383.3655600.442841513.22BFE21F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<1447882210.1528738.443668657.2E2AAB9D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <CFB9B2A6-6DF4-47FE-932B-29DCD5DEDA14@jabberwocky.com>

On Nov 18, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 14:29, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 11:36, Jeff McKay wrote:
>>> I just tried it and I would agree with David that O365 is indeed behaving as he described - no untagged OK in response to UID MOVE.
>>  
>> I can also confirm this - sorry about the few hour delay, dentist appointment in the middle of all this.
>>  
>> I've bought myself an O365 account and tested it just to see it for myself, this is with openssl s_client
>>  
>> . FETCH 1:* UID
>> * 1 FETCH (UID 8)
>> . OK FETCH completed.
>> . MOVE 1 Extra
>> [COPYUID 78 8 1]
>> * 1 EXPUNGE
>> * 0 EXISTS
>> . OK MOVE completed.
>  
> Have heard from someone at Microsoft that they are aware of the problem - so I guess the message got through to whoever needed to know.
>  
> I don't know what their test/deploy cycle looks like - it will be interesting to see how long until the fix makes it out to production.

That's great.  I am very pleased to hear it.

It does seem like the issue has been around for a long time.  I found a bug report for this problem from October of 2014: https://github.com/jstedfast/MailKit/issues/115

David


