MBOX-Line: From kroshka at atypon.com  Mon May 21 16:24:42 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Jeroen van Aart <kroshka@atypon.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] LIST + STATUS
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0705210757470.8377@pangtzu.panda.com>
References: <1179521035.32181.1029.camel@hurina>	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0705210402190.19541@skarrin.mho.net>	<1179745964.32181.1398.camel@hurina>
	<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705210757470.8377@pangtzu.panda.com>
Message-ID: <46522A3A.9030402@atypon.com>

Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> I'm mostly thinking about these webmails that open a new connection for
>> each page refresh,
> 
> This is of no concern to me.  Such webmails are broken by design, and 
> need to be exterminated.  The fact that such webmails do not work well 
> now is a feature.

I fully agree with your sentiment.

To the original poster: One solution might be to use an imapproxy and 
configure your webmail client to use that instead. I have setup 
squirrelmail to do that. I don't know if squirrelmail is one of the 
"should be exterminated" webmails or not, I like it, but then many 
things people like are broken by design, sadly... Just as a side note, a 
large Dutch isp called xs4all uses it for their customers.

Hope that helps.

Best regards,
Jeroen

