MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca  Thu Jun 14 13:58:34 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] FLAGS & PERMANENTFLAGS in IMAP4rev1
In-Reply-To: <fc2c80ae0706140126r7a8d511csa3c17aa2e2eaec15@mail.gmail.com>
References: <466FE56C.7000900@hiramoto.org> 
	<fc2c80ae0706132348w7cddbe34jbc589498a78b3cff@mail.gmail.com> 
	<20070614003209.E9774@orthanc.ca>
	<fc2c80ae0706140126r7a8d511csa3c17aa2e2eaec15@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070614135814.E17807@orthanc.ca>

> I do not see anything wrong in using flags for marking messages as Junk.

There isn't, as long as all the clients agree on the same set of flags.

--lyndon

   We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
   the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
   this is not true.
   			-- Robert Wilensky, University of California

