MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca  Mon Jun 14 10:08:33 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:44 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1006111725170.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <201006110854.37969.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<201006120124.53714.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<alpine.BSO.2.00.1006111628220.28689@vanye.sendmail.com>
	<201006120159.05366.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1006111725170.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.1.10.1006141005450.2640@mbp.lyndon.corp.flock.com>

> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Witold Kr?cicki wrote:
>>> It's been discussed multiple times in the past (oh, why does no one
>>> actually read the archives?) how to implement the Trash Can UI on top of
>>> the IMAP \deleted+EXPUNGE model.  And guess what, that can do something
>>> the "trash can is a mailbox" model can't: undelete restores the message to
>>> its original place in the mailbox.
>> And still there is no working implementation of this model. Wonder why...
>
> You don't seriously intend to say that nobody uses undelete in IMAP?
>
> If you do believe that, then you are wrong.  I know of multiple clients,
> including at least one with millions of users, that have undelete as
> Philip describes.

Simeon had this behaviour from day one, which was circa 1994?

--lyndon

