MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Sun Jul 22 23:24:32 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Unordered FETCH replies
In-Reply-To: <1185164783.25618.157.camel@hurina>
References: <1185164783.25618.157.camel@hurina>
Message-ID: <SiUoOH/TOnCUwgNjSV1qDA.md5@libertango.oryx.com>

Timo Sirainen writes:
> Has anyone tried how badly clients would break if FETCH didn't send 
> replies ordered by the sequence number?

Yes, and no breakage. Clients break on many things they should handle 
(try sending lowercase OK/NO/BAD ;) but that one seems fine.

(We changed to strict increasing order later because of testing constraints.)

Arnt

