MBOX-Line: From dinh.viet.hoa at gmail.com  Mon Mar  9 21:35:53 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: "Hoa V. DINH" <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
 it be different?
In-Reply-To: <CAP1qinZT9xkSAJ1QoaPK_S6V7PLw59i6J4MpyU3Sn7TMq0ZiTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
	<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
	<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<6506.1425915329@parc.com> <B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
	<CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<7782A916-12BB-488C-BD57-697FDB5D47E2@orthanc.ca>
	<CAP1qinY-d_fpmfwJ=04GUZhAnkZpPxzwMGfVdn8--4z=tJT5_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<0C18524D-28EC-4DF9-A888-678E7DD4E56A@orthanc.ca>
	<CAP1qinZT9xkSAJ1QoaPK_S6V7PLw59i6J4MpyU3Sn7TMq0ZiTg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <26AB3DC45CA940E1B88C705DA21772DA@gmail.com>

Please go ahead.  

(Btw, text protocol doesn?t seem to be an issue with chat app (FYI they use jabber, which is a verbose protocol using XML))



--  
Hoa V. DINH


On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Imants Cekusins wrote:

> Let's take chat messages as an example. They are fast. much faster
> than email, aren't they? Why? Isn't it a similar concept: text
> (transmitted as bytes) flowing from one browser to another - via an
> intermediate server?
>  
> Web servers are getting more efficient, databases are getting more efficient.
>  
> Why not bring email servers up to speed?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20150309/b880920d/attachment.html>
