MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi  Mon Mar 12 17:54:48 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SEARCH restricted to one mailbox? Extensions?
In-Reply-To: <07Mar12.161606pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
References: <07Mar12.152936pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<1173743673.9167.65.camel@hurina>
	<07Mar12.161606pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
Message-ID: <1173747288.9167.110.camel@hurina>

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 17:16 -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
> 
> 
> Yep, that's what I was thinking.  I think I'd keep one message in it
> -- not sure how empty folders are regarded by clients.

I don't think there are any problems with empty mailboxes.

> Is there an out-of-band way of announcing a new mailbox?

Sending an untagged * LIST reply (and LSUB maybe). I doubt there are
many (any?) clients that pick it up though.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20070313/dc6606da/attachment.sig>
