MBOX-Line: From dave at cridland.net  Mon Dec  3 14:23:34 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:41 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] idle and multi-mailbox access
In-Reply-To: <fc2c80ae0712020349x1402576ehd93bc122fbdbef2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fc2c80ae0712020349x1402576ehd93bc122fbdbef2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2639.1196720614.306175@peirce.dave.cridland.net>

On Sun Dec  2 11:49:08 2007, DINH Vi?t Ho? wrote:
> is the following draft supposed to solve that problem ?
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-01

Short answer: Yes.

Long answer: Kind of - "unread" is not an IMAP "thing", as such, and  
NOTIFY will tell you about "unseen", not "unread". Philip van Hoof,  
amongst others, has been talking about the distinction recently, and  
it's quite possible this is something that ought to be addressed.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@jabber.org
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

