MBOX-Line: From jkt at flaska.net  Tue Mar 10 02:40:23 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= <jkt@flaska.net>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol]
	=?iso-8859-1?q?If_Crispin_were_creating_IMAP_toda?=
	=?iso-8859-1?q?y_how_would_it_be_different=3F?=
In-Reply-To: <CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
	<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
	<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<6506.1425915329@parc.com> <B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
	<CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <80feadb5-24d0-4be9-a6d9-7885f422ad07@flaska.net>

On Monday, 9 March 2015 22:19:35 CET, Imants Cekusins wrote:
> It also consumes a lot of CPU resources - visibly.

I don't know which server you're basing your observations on, but my 
suggestion is to try benchmarking a recent version of one of the popular 
Linux mail servers at first (perhaps Postfix with Dovecot or Cyrus). If the 
actual throughput of this stack still bothers you, please post the numbers 
-- I'm always interested in reading a well-executed benchmark. Comparing 
the data to some other e-mail servers might be even a bit entertaining, I 
suspect.

With kind regards,
Jan

-- 
Trojit?, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/

