MBOX-Line: From snowjn at aol.com  Fri Oct 22 14:48:19 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: John Snow <snowjn@aol.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Session flags.
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1010221323490.69345@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <4CC1E456.5050208@aol.com>
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1010221233060.69345@hsinghsing.panda.com>
	<4CC1EFDD.3000606@aol.com>
	<alpine.OSX.2.00.1010221323490.69345@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <4CC206A3.8010909@aol.com>

You're welcome, though no attack was intended. It is my opinion.

But what about my question? 

snow.


Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, John Snow wrote:
>> So it's only to give read-only access the illusion of full access?
>> That seems pretty silly.  Read only should mean read only.
>
> Thank you for sharing your opinion of my design.
>
> -- Mark --
>
> http://panda.com/mrc
> Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
> Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20101022/b562f40a/attachment.html>
