MBOX-Line: From derek.diget+imap-protocol at wmich.edu  Fri Jan 13 08:36:12 2012
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Derek Diget <derek.diget+imap-protocol@wmich.edu>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:47 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] which IMAP servers support support SASL
	authorization vs. authentication ID?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1201130725430.38441@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1201130725430.38441@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.62.1201131116380.3388@spaz.oit.wmich.edu>


On Jan 13, 2012 at 07:44 -0800, Mark Crispin wrote:
=>I have been tasked to identify which IMAP servers support the SASL concept
=>of authorization vs. authentication ID and if it is suitable to allow
=>impersonation; that is to proxy to various user accounts.
=>
=>I have the following data:
=>
=>Panda IMAP:		Yes
=>	;; Authenticated userids in system group "mailadm" may authorize
=>	;; to any other userid.
=>
=>UW IMAP:		Yes, in newer versions
=>	;; Same as Panda
=>
=>
=>Probably yes, but not sure and need details:
=>
=>Cyrus:
=>Dovecot:
=>Communigate Pro:
=>Sendmail:
=>Zimbra:

Non-Authoritative answer as I am just a admin/user, but

Sun's Communication Suite, now know as Oracle Communications Messaging 
Exchange Server seems to per

<https://wikis.oracle.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15467378>


(We use the non-standard PROXYAUTH command with the imapsync perl script 
for mailbox migrations, etc.)

-- 
***********************************************************************
Derek Diget                            Office of Information Technology
Western Michigan University - Kalamazoo  Michigan  USA - www.wmich.edu/
***********************************************************************

