MBOX-Line: From dinh.viet.hoa at gmail.com  Fri Mar  1 19:02:41 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ho=C3=A0_V._Dinh?= <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:50 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] CONDSTORE RFC typo
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzx08_5zLUJLxkW0EZVdXv0FYiTJERdAWT7g8AqtDJsXfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D5C2D620280948758A0A23AA6E73314C@gmail.com>
	<CAKHUCzx08_5zLUJLxkW0EZVdXv0FYiTJERdAWT7g8AqtDJsXfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <DEFFB11078934EB287BB19A259C0B3D6@gmail.com>

On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>  
>  
> On Feb 28, 2013 5:24 PM, "Ho? V. Dinh" <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com (mailto:dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > RFC 1730 and RFC 2060 mentioned "set". It's been changed to sequence-set in RFC 3501.
> > Therefore, I think the same name should be applied in RFC 4551.
>  
>  
> I agree - thankfully it's quite minor. You want to submit an errata?
>  
>  
> Dave.
>  
>  
>  

Here you go: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4551&eid=3506

--  
Ho? V. Dinh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130301/75309cb9/attachment.html>
