MBOX-Line: From dot at dotat.at  Mon Jan 18 11:16:54 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:43 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS?
In-Reply-To: <01NILPQ96AXS004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <9A584868-5961-4871-B32E-915394043727@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>
	<01NIK8RBBRJK004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
	<alpine.LSU.2.00.1001181311440.6203@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
	<01NILLMPPQHY004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
	<alpine.LSU.2.00.1001181712010.6203@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
	<01NILPQ96AXS004042@mauve.mrochek.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1001181913280.6203@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Ned Freed wrote:
>
> The tradeoff here is much more subtle - it's question of which is more
> problematic, requiring submission stay on port 25 where it's conflated with
> relay operations, or accepting the use of smtps to get it to move someewhere
> else.

You also have to consider port 25 blocks. Roaming users in particular need
to avoid configuring their MUA to use port 25. Hence RFC 5068.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.

