MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no  Thu Nov 24 04:03:48 2005
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun  8 12:34:36 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: IMAP capability for maximum APPEND message
	size?
In-Reply-To: <000001c5f0ec$958051d0$6301a8c0@xms.co.za>
References: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0511231556030.533@pangtzu.panda.com><27488.1132823348.282206@peirce.dave.cridland.net><43858BAB.7080404@sun.com>
	<000001c5f0ec$958051d0$6301a8c0@xms.co.za>
Message-ID: <EBbphoAAbzWUJtMWzfGZcg.md5@[10.0.0.123]>

Dave Cridland writes:
> Pete Maclean has already proposed it be a NAMESPACE extension, I'd 
> prefer it to be per-mailbox, and try to provide a sensible 
> architecture for per-mailbox capabilities at the same time, instead 
> of the suck-it-and-see mechanisms we have now. (BINARY APPEND support 
> is another per-mailbox capability, currently handled by 
> suck-it-and-see.)

Multiselect is a third.

Arnt

