Rework "subscribed" mailbox semantics #41

Closed
opened 2 years ago by epilys · 1 comments
epilys commented 2 years ago
Owner

Right now, mailboxes have to be "subscribed" in order to be shown in meli. That comes in opposition with the concept of server-side subscription in remote backends such as IMAP.

Questions to be resolved:

  • Should configuration file subscriptions be ignored in favour of server side subscription? Should it be an error?
  • How to communicate the existence of unsubscribed mailboxes to the user?
  • Server side subscription can be set with commands. What is a better word to call config-file subscription to avoid this conflict in meanings?
Right now, mailboxes have to be "subscribed" in order to be shown in `meli`. That comes in opposition with the concept of server-side subscription in remote backends such as IMAP. Questions to be resolved: * Should configuration file subscriptions be ignored in favour of server side subscription? Should it be an error? * How to communicate the existence of unsubscribed mailboxes to the user? * Server side subscription can be set with commands. What is a better word to call config-file subscription to avoid this conflict in meanings?
epilys added this to the release milestone 2 years ago
epilys added the
invalid
question
IMAP
JMAP
labels 2 years ago
Poster
Owner

Closed in #169

Closed in #169
epilys closed this issue 6 days ago
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
There is no content yet.